<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eee PC 900 battery life: Not so good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eee PC 900 battery life tests. Thoughts on Atom. &#124; UMPCPortal - Ultra Mobile Personal Computing</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-43003</link>
		<dc:creator>Eee PC 900 battery life tests. Thoughts on Atom. &#124; UMPCPortal - Ultra Mobile Personal Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-43003</guid>
		<description>[...] Liliputing. Source. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liliputing. Source. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobH</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-47790</link>
		<dc:creator>BobH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-47790</guid>
		<description>There is a very extensive report on the 900 at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eeeuser.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eeeuser.com&lt;/a&gt; from someone in the UK.  It has the 4400 battery.  Interesting is that it appears that the wireless is not as good at picking up a signal in the 900 as in the 701.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a very extensive report on the 900 at <a href="http://www.eeeuser.com/" rel="nofollow">eeeuser.com</a> from someone in the UK.  It has the 4400 battery.  Interesting is that it appears that the wireless is not as good at picking up a signal in the 900 as in the 701.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobH</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-4982</link>
		<dc:creator>BobH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-4982</guid>
		<description>There is a very extensive report on the 900 at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eeeuser.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eeeuser.com&lt;/a&gt; from someone in the UK.  It has the 4400 battery.  Interesting is that it appears that the wireless is not as good at picking up a signal in the 900 as in the 701.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a very extensive report on the 900 at <a href="http://www.eeeuser.com/" rel="nofollow">eeeuser.com</a> from someone in the UK.  It has the 4400 battery.  Interesting is that it appears that the wireless is not as good at picking up a signal in the 900 as in the 701.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobH</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>BobH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-663</guid>
		<description>There is a very extensive report on the 900 at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eeeuser.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eeeuser.com&lt;/a&gt; from someone in the UK.  It has the 4400 battery.  Interesting is that it appears that the wireless is not as good at picking up a signal in the 900 as in the 701.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a very extensive report on the 900 at <a href="http://www.eeeuser.com/" rel="nofollow">eeeuser.com</a> from someone in the UK.  It has the 4400 battery.  Interesting is that it appears that the wireless is not as good at picking up a signal in the 900 as in the 701.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-662</guid>
		<description>That doesn&#039;t seem too bad to me considering the larger screen and the Eee 900 also runs the CPU at the full 900MHz, not 630MHz like the 701.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#8217;t seem too bad to me considering the larger screen and the Eee 900 also runs the CPU at the full 900MHz, not 630MHz like the 701.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmj</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>mmj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 01:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-661</guid>
		<description>According to the tests done here, the battery life of the Eee 900 far outlasts all the similar products tested including the HP mini-note (with extended battery) and the Sony TZ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the tests done here, the battery life of the Eee 900 far outlasts all the similar products tested including the HP mini-note (with extended battery) and the Sony TZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saab_rider</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>saab_rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 01:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-660</guid>
		<description>28-33 minutes difference... I&#039;d say that&#039;s acceptable  by my standards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I plan to get my 900 with the 5800 anyway. Maybe the 5200... But not the 4400.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus I want to get the 10400 mAh battery too. Would be nice to see results of the 10400 on the 900 compared to the 700.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28-33 minutes difference&#8230; I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s acceptable  by my standards.</p>
<p>I plan to get my 900 with the 5800 anyway. Maybe the 5200&#8230; But not the 4400.</p>
<p>Plus I want to get the 10400 mAh battery too. Would be nice to see results of the 10400 on the 900 compared to the 700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryRubin</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryRubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Slightly off topic but related- a couple blogs yesterday reported that US pre-orders for the 900 would begin today. None of the retailers listed in those reports seem to be offering them yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you have any info about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly off topic but related- a couple blogs yesterday reported that US pre-orders for the 900 would begin today. None of the retailers listed in those reports seem to be offering them yet.</p>
<p>Do you have any info about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Linder</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-658</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still not clear to me if Asus will be shipping ALL new units with the higher capacity battery, or if the company will just be replacing the batteries of customers who complain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still not clear to me if Asus will be shipping ALL new units with the higher capacity battery, or if the company will just be replacing the batteries of customers who complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korgmeister</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Korgmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/05/eee-pc-900-battery-life-not-so-good.html#comment-657</guid>
		<description>Fair cop, Brad! Didn&#039;t ASUS say they were going to fix their low capacity battery goof several weeks ago? I think you even wrote a post on this site about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair cop, Brad! Didn&#8217;t ASUS say they were going to fix their low capacity battery goof several weeks ago? I think you even wrote a post on this site about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

